On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Vedran Krivokuca <vkrivokuca@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Vedran Krivokuca <vkrivokuca@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) we can go with different instances of PostgreSQL service, let's say > (for pure theory) 10 of them on the same HA cluster setup. Every > instance would hold let's say 1/10th of that big recordset, and around > 3.000 database tables (this apparently shouldn't be of any problem to > PostgreSQL, see below).
I am talking shit here, obviously, excuse me. We would go with, for example, 10 or 100 databases in the same PostgreSQL instance. Buzzwording got better of me. :) The rest of my initial e-mail still applies, I will cherish any input of experience on this subject.
V.
-- Pozdrav/Greetings, Vedran Krivokuća Disclaimer: This message may contain information.
I think that a limitation would be on the OS (filesystem and kernel) because each table is a file (or more) under a directory (per database). I haven't got experience on how
modern Linux system cope with that but i think it would be something easy to test. Database wise you shouldn't have a problem.
