On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2017-05-01 1:21 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
>>
>> On 2017-04-30 07:19:21 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > why we cannot to introduce GUC option - enable_cteoptfence ?
>>
>> Doesn't really solve the issue, and we've generally shied away from GUCs
>> that influence behaviour after a few bad experiences. What if you want
>> one CTE inlined, but another one not?
>
>
> It change behave in same sense like enable_nestloop, enable_hashjoin, ...
> with same limits.
And then we recall plan hints :)
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>>
>> - Andres
>
>
