Andres,
you can always look at our development repository:
https://github.com/feodor/postgres/tree/hstore - hstore only,
https://github.com/feodor/postgres/tree/jsonb_and_hstore - hstore with jsonb
Since we were concentrated on the jsonb_and_hstore branch we usually
wait Andrew, who publish patch. You last issues were addressed in
both branches.
Oleg
PS.
We are not native-english and may not well inderstand your criticism
well, but please try to be a little bit polite. We are working
together and our common goal is to make postgres better. Your notes
are very important for quality of postgres, but sometimes you drive us
...
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-03 08:57:59 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > On 2014-02-28 14:45:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> >> Well, the jsonb portion of this is arguably the most ready, certainly it's
>> >> had a lot more on-list review.
>> >
>> > Having crossread both patches I tend to agree with this. I don't think
>> > it's unrealistic to get jsonb committable, but the hstore bits are
>> > another story.
>>
>> hm, do you have any specific concerns/objections about hstore?
>
> I've listed a fair number in various emails, some have been addressed
> since I think. But just take a look at the patch, at least last when I
> looked, it was simply far from ready. And it's quite a bit of code, so
> it's not something that can be addressed within 5min.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
