Understanding BRIN index performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ivan Voras
Subject Understanding BRIN index performance
Date
Msg-id CAF-QHFVurB6hYjb2e1D-tn4rwOS9mp87vR2ymBM0LS3+iHYmiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Understanding BRIN index performance  ("Madusudanan.B.N" <b.n.madusudanan@gmail.com>)
Re: Understanding BRIN index performance  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

I have a table of around 20 G, more than 220 million records, and I'm running this query on it:

explain analyze SELECT MAX(id) - (SELECT id FROM expl_transactions WHERE dateAdded < (now() - INTERVAL '10 MINUTES') ORDER BY dateAdded DESC LIMIT 1) FROM expl_transactions;

"id" is SERIAL, "dateAdded" is timestamp without timezone

The "dateAdded" field also has a "default now()" applied to it some time after its creation, and a fair amount of null values in the records (which I don't think matters for this query, but maybe I'm wrong).

My first idea is to create a default BRIN index on dateAdded since the above query is not run frequently. To my surprise, the planner refused to use the index and used sequential scan instead. When I forced sequential scanning off, I got this:


The query was executing for 40+ seconds. It seems like the "index scan" on it returns nearly 9% of the table, 25 mil rows. Since the data in dateAdded actually is sequential and fairly selective (having now() as the default over a long period of time), this surprises me.

With a normal btree index, of course, it runs fine:



Any ideas?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Millions of tables
Next
From: "Madusudanan.B.N"
Date:
Subject: Re: Understanding BRIN index performance