On 3 November 2011 15:15, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote:
>> Do the xobject_id values have other negative numbers or is -1 just a special
>> case? The only thing I can think of is a corrupted index on xobject_id.
>
> minimal xobject_id in source table is 1000.
>
> index on xobject_id might be corrupted, but it doesn't explain that I
> don't see duplicates with group_by/having query on xobjects, which uses
> seqscan:
Actually, it does. A sequential scan doesn't use the index.
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.