Re: UDF in C slow - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alban Hertroys
Subject Re: UDF in C slow
Date
Msg-id CAF-3MvNt+9yd0VvDnXTV5Y3gNERgZUPtd0HCFk=xRvCijLfFVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to UDF in C slow  (Inanc Seylan <inanc.seylan@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: UDF in C slow
List pgsql-general
On 11 May 2012 15:57, Inanc Seylan <inanc.seylan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have implemented a user-defined function in C that returns a boolean value
> after some computation. Now I have a query Q such that when I specify the
> function in the WHERE clause of Q, Q runs in 40 secs and if I don't use the
> function it runs in 4 secs. Then I thought that my implementation of this
> function could be slow; so I decided to write a very simple function that
> just returns true without any computation. To my surprise, it also takes
> around 40 seconds to run Q with the new very simple function. Does anybody
> have a clue about what might be going wrong?

Is that a VOLATILE, STABLE or IMMUTABLE function? What's the output of
EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: avoiding CONTEXT messages
Next
From: Inanc Seylan
Date:
Subject: Re: UDF in C slow