Re: About BoringSSL, an OpenSSL fork - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Geoff Winkless |
---|---|
Subject | Re: About BoringSSL, an OpenSSL fork |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAEzk6ffo=EszuMpPiYXpjbRK4ugEdEHaS4-A3abcdink_EWy+w@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | About BoringSSL, an OpenSSL fork (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On26 October 2015 at 00:59, Michael Paquier </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<ahref="mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com" target="_blank">michael.paquier@gmail.com</a>></span><spanstyle="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span><br /></div><divclass="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><a href="https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/HEAD/PORTING.md"rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/HEAD/PORTING.md</a><br/> Looking at the porting section manyroutines have changed compared to<br /> OpenSSL. I can't imagine this fork to become a complete replacement of<br />OpenSSL, but it may be worth considering an integration in Postgres<br /> code depending on the features it will have (Curve25519,<br/> Ed25519 mentioned). Also since 9.4 the SSL code paths have been<br /> rearranged to allow more implementationsto be done with other SSL<br /> libraries.<br /></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><divclass="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><divclass="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Quote:</div><div class="gmail_default"style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br /></div><p style="margin:10px 0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:'OpenSans',sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:21.56px"><span style="line-height:21.56px"></span></div><blockquotestyle="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div class="gmail_extra"><divclass="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline"></div>AlthoughBoringSSL is an open source project,it is not intended for general use, <span style="line-height:21.56px">as OpenSSL is. We don’t recommend that thirdparties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.</span><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;line-height:normal;color:rgb(34,34,34)"></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;line-height:normal;color:rgb(34,34,34)"><br /></span></div></blockquote><divclass="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Soundslike a subscription to a world of pain.</div><br /></div><divclass="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Geoff</div></div></div>
pgsql-hackers by date: