Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WjhdVCqEe_qqEok3NA6DwUdOGSBjAxzmYdAqiaaH1uRcg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 21:10, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:42 PM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure, added in attached.
>
> I think this mostly looks good now but I just realized that I think
> this needs rephrasing:
>
> +     To restore incremental backups the tool <xref
> linkend="app-pgcombinebackup"/>
> +     is used, which combines incremental backups with a base backup and
> +     <glossterm linkend="glossary-wal">WAL</glossterm> to restore a
> +     <glossterm linkend="glossary-db-cluster">database cluster</glossterm> to
> +     a consistent state.
>
> The way this is worded, at least to me, it makes it sound like
> pg_combinebackup is going to do the WAL recovery for you, which it
> isn't. Maybe:
>
> To restore incremental backups the tool <xref
> linkend="app-pgcombinebackup"/> is used, which combines incremental
> backups with a base backup. Afterwards, recovery can use <glossterm
> linkend="glossary-wal">WAL</glossterm> to bring the <glossterm
> linkend="glossary-db-cluster">database cluster</glossterm> to a
> consistent state.

Sure, that's fine with me.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Neon (https://neon.tech)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: subscription disable_on_error not working after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION set bad conninfo