Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal
Date
Msg-id CAEze2Wj8Za=p+sOW=w_rEYnSykmeFoLo9+rxyPyahBE0qRz-eA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 17:04, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 7:51 AM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that mostly has to do with reliability / stability of ORDER BY
> > in combination with LIMIT and OFFSET, even though right now we cannot
> > fully guarantee such stability due to unstable results from underlying
> > plan nodes.
>
> The current qsort isn't stable.

Then I misunderstood Robert's comment, thanks for correcting me.

- Matthias

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: allow specifying action when standby encounters incompatible parameter settings