On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 12:59, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> Too small value of work_mem cause memory overflow in parallel hash join
> because of too much number batches.
> There is the plan:
[...]
> There is still some gap between size reported by memory context sump and
> actual size of backend.
> But is seems to be obvious, that trying to fit in work_mem
> sharedtuplestore creates so much batches, that them consume much more
> memory than work_mem.
The same issue [0] was reported a few weeks ago, with the same
diagnosis here [1]. I think it's being worked on over there.
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20230228190643.1e368315%40karst
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3013398b-316c-638f-2a73-3783e8e2ef02%40enterprisedb.com#ceb9e14383122ade8b949b7479c6f7e2
