Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Venkata B Nagothi
Subject Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Date
Msg-id CAEyp7J_k-_qEE74B039XCK5UXVK_vqFZqdzx4GNpXLrdhAjzXw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers



Regards,

Venkata B N
Database Consultant
 

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
This conflicts with 6912acc (replication lag tracker) so just
rebased on a6f22e8.

I tried applying this patch to latest master, it is not getting applied

[dba@buildhost postgresql]$ git apply /data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch
/data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch:28: trailing whitespace.
/*
/data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch:29: trailing whitespace.
 * This variable corresponds to restart_lsn in pg_replication_slots for a
/data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch:30: trailing whitespace.
 * physical slot. This has a valid value only when it differs from the current
/data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch:31: trailing whitespace.
 * flush pointer.
/data/postgresql-patches/9.5-ReplicationSlots-Bug-Patch/0001-Fix-a-bug-of-physical-replication-slot_a6f22e8.patch:32: trailing whitespace.
 */
error: patch failed: src/backend/replication/walsender.c:210
error: src/backend/replication/walsender.c: patch does not apply

Regards,

Venkata Balaji N
Database Consultant

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?