We're running into issues with canceled queries on a standby server and have be debating between enabling hot_standby_feedback and setting max_standby_streaming_delay to something large.
Using max_standby_streaming_delay seems to have the advantage of keeping the master independent of the standby, but will a long running query mean that all WAL commits are delayed? Or just those that affected by the long running query?
If you set max_standby_streaming_delay to a large value, WAL commits are going to continue until there is a conflict with the running queries on standby. If a WAL commit encounters a conflict, then the WAL update on standby will wait for "max_standby_streaming_delay" amount of time and until then all the subsequent WAL commits will be paused. In otherwords - entire standby recovery will be paused.
Another alternative would be use "pg_xlog_replay_pause()" and "pg_xlog_replay_resume()" functions if that is possible with your application. Execute the "pg_xlog_replay_pause()" - then the query/job - then "pg_xlog_replay_resume()" function.
