Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5vff9JbUY0HCBt=8p+q0QSfA7P9wbiKCMuEHYDj9xiRNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > May be attach the patch to hackers thread (this) as well?
>
> If you want, sure.  I thought it was good enough if the thread
> is accessible via the commitfest app.

The addition is long enough that it deserved to be outside of parentheses.

I think it's worth mentioning the exception but in a way that avoids
repeating what's mentioned in the last paragraph of just the previous
section. I don't have brilliant ideas about how to rephrase it.

Maybe "Using ONLY to add or drop a constraint, other than PRIMARY and
UNIQUE, on only the partitioned table is supported as long as there
are no partitions. ...".

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test.
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized view in Postgres from the variables rather than SQL query results