> It's not clear, without some effort, which lock mode go with which row lock in that description. > For example, "keysh" does not have "for" in it but "fornokeyupd" does. How about rephrasing this > as "The lock modes "keysh", "sh", fornokeyupd", and "forupd" correspond to > <literal>FOR KEY SHARE</literal>, <literal>FOR SHARE</literal>, <literal>FOR NO KEY UPDATE</literal>, > and <literal>FOR UPDATE</literal> row level locks respectively as described in <xref linkend="locking-rows"/>."
That works for me.
> Do we want to add the section "Multixact Information Functions" after other transaction related > sections like "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Function" and > " Committed Transaction Information Functions" instead of adding it at the end?
makes sense.
Attached patch removing extra comma. Otherwise LGTM.
Please add the patch to CF, if not already done and mark it as "ready for committer".
