Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5uU6=GydOP1X+MGtP=W4eB=WdhkpfuqmPRK0xe0fTQXJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 3:37 PM Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:59 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:43 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have not looked at the pg_dump code yet, so the changes included here
>> > are just pgindent.
>> >
>>
>> I ran pg_upgrade suite with the patches. 002_pg_upgrade fails with
>> following test log
>
>
> This is strange because when I run the tests it's all passing for me.
>
> # +++ tap check in src/bin/pg_upgrade +++
> t/001_basic.pl .......... ok
> t/002_pg_upgrade.pl ..... ok
> t/003_logical_slots.pl .. ok
> t/004_subscription.pl ... ok
> All tests successful.
> Files=4, Tests=53, 38 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.00 sys +  2.88 cusr  2.11 csys =  5.00 CPU)
> Result: PASS
>
> Note: I applied the patch on commit 7202d72787d3b93b692feae62ee963238580c877.

I applied patches on 984410b923263cac901fa81e0efbe523e9c36df3 and I am
using meson.

If I apply your patches, build binaries, I see failure. I reverted
your patches, built binaries, I don't see failure. I apply your
patches again, built binaries, it fails again.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Bibliography section, some references cannot be found
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing