Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:40 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 18:49 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 19:22 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > > > May be attach the patch to hackers thread (this) as well?
> > >
> > > If you want, sure.  I thought it was good enough if the thread
> > > is accessible via the commitfest app.
> >
> > The addition is long enough that it deserved to be outside of parentheses.
> >
> > I think it's worth mentioning the exception but in a way that avoids
> > repeating what's mentioned in the last paragraph of just the previous
> > section. I don't have brilliant ideas about how to rephrase it.
> >
> > Maybe "Using ONLY to add or drop a constraint, other than PRIMARY and
> > UNIQUE, on only the partitioned table is supported as long as there
> > are no partitions. ...".
>
> I agree that the parenthesis is too long.  I shortened it in the attached
> patch. Is that acceptable?

It's still longer than the actual sentence :). I am fine with it if
somebody else finds it acceptable.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat