Re: Insert Documentation - Returning Clause and Order - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Insert Documentation - Returning Clause and Order
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5t-qErdoEnrO5N3=UwYN16NjKn0VG0M7M7pXZfyobv_iQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Insert Documentation - Returning Clause and Order  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Insert Documentation - Returning Clause and Order
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 8:41 PM David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 7:02 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Certainly almost every ORM, and maybe even other forms of application
>> code, need to be able to associate the serial column value returned
>> with what it inserted.
>
>
> Yet most ORM would perform single inserts at a time, not in bulk, making such a feature irrelevant to them.
>
> I don't think having such a feature is all that important personally, but the question comes every so often and it
wouldbe nice to be able to point at the documentation for a definitive answer - not just one inferred from a lack of
documentation- especially since the observed behavior is that order is preserved today. 
>

That's a valid usecase, but adding such a guarantee in documentation
would restrict implementation. So at best we can say "no order is
guaranteed". But we write what's guaranteed. Anything not written in
the documents is not guaranteed.

There are ways to get it working, but let's not go into those details
in this thread.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature improvement for pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Amul Sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY