On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 10:08, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > I'm skeptical. If we'd marked them that way from day one, it would have
> > been fine, but to change it now is a whole different discussion. I think
> > the odds that anybody will thank us are much smaller than the odds that
> > there will be complaints. In particular, I'd be just about certain that
> > there are people out there who are changing FOUND and loop control
> > variables manually, and they will not appreciate us breaking their code.
>
> I kind of doubt it would break anybody's code. But I also doubt it's
> actually going to help anybody. It's not exactly an easy bug to write,
> so meh, I can't really get worked up either way about this.
We could retain the old behaviour by using a GUC which defaults to old
behaviour. More GUCs means more confusion, this once guc under plpgsql
extension might actually help.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
