Re: Setting up HA postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From William Dunn
Subject Re: Setting up HA postgresql
Date
Msg-id CAEva=Vnyi7cOBxWwkKe26iJ_p_NDAY-geCZevHV-brX6UZ73qQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting up HA postgresql  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Setting up HA postgresql  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
That's pretty cool! But the intended use of watchdog is so you can have multiple pgpool-II instances and failover among them (http://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/pgpool-en.html#watchdog) rather than failure of Postgres. In the configuration described in that wiki what happens when the DBMS goes down but pgpool-II is fine? The watchdog appears to be monitoring the pgpool-II process, not the postgres/postmaster process.

Will J. Dunn

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

On 07/21/2015 11:04 AM, William Dunn wrote:
If you dig deeper into pgpool-II you will find that it does not have
failover logic. Its intention is to pool connections and distribute
query load among replicas, but it cannot differentiate node failure from
network partition and cannot promote a standby to master in the case of
failure.

If you dig deeper, I think you would find your statement is no longer accurate:

http://www.pgpool.net/pgpool-web/contrib_docs/watchdog_master_slave_3.3/en.html


JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot reach pg server using -h localhost
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting up HA postgresql