Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ranier Vilela
Subject Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber
Date
Msg-id CAEudQArYy-J+_UmmkgwaBz9ZJJP9TskdgdK3YQD4ivux2LvS7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers


Em qui., 27 de fev. de 2025 às 22:19, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:23:31AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Yeah, I also think it would look good like this.

It's the least confusing option, indeed.  I've reduced a bit the diffs
and done that down to v16 for the pg_upgrade part where this exists.
Thanks Michael.


Double-checking the tree, it does not seem that we have simolar holes
now..  I hope that I'm not wrong.
I think so.
 
best regards,
Ranier Vilela

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication