Em seg., 1 de abr. de 2024 às 14:52, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
"Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote: >> Coverity has some reports in the new code >> pg_createsubscriber.c >> I think that Coverity is right.
> It depends on your "right" definition. If your program execution is ephemeral > and the leak is just before exiting, do you think it's worth it?
I agree with Ranier, actually. The functions in question don't exit() themselves, but return control to a caller that might or might not choose to exit. I don't think they should be assuming that an exit will happen promptly, even if that's true today.
The community Coverity run found a few additional leaks of the same kind in that file. I pushed a merged fix for all of them.
