Em sex., 8 de set. de 2023 às 03:24, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 07:57:03AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > I think no one objected.
Looking closer, there is much more inconsistency in this file depending on the routine called. How about something like the v2 attached instead to provide more context in the error message about the function called?
+1
But as Jeff mentioned, when the locale is NULL,
the provider is known to be COLLPROVIDER_LIBC.
I think we can use this to provide an error message,