Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAEudQAp3v-oxajT6EJoVrLQ2pf_4Aun+DLD4WXB7f8atnWJsmg@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
Sorry for not responding quickly.
I have been without communication until now.
I have been without communication until now.
Em qua., 18 de dez. de 2024 às 17:13, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> escreveu:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 1:23 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Em qua., 18 de dez. de 2024 às 14:01, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> For now, I've committed the version of the patch I proposed above (v3).
>
> What happens if *rs_tuples* equal to zero in function *SampleHeapTupleVisible*?
> end = hscan->rs_ntuples - 1;
Ah yes, it seems like just changing the top if statement to
if (scan->rs_flags & SO_ALLOW_PAGEMODE &&
hscan->rs_ntuples > 0)
Thanks for identifying this.
> Would be good to fix the binary search too, now that unsigned types are used.
You just mean the one in SampleHeapTupleVisible(), right?
> Patch attached.
I'm not sure the attached patch is quite right because if rs_ntuples
is 0, it should still enter the first if statement and then return
false. In fact, with your patch, I think we would incorrectly not
return a value when rs_ntuples is 0 from SampleHeapTupleVisible().
I'm wondering if *rs_tuples* is zero, would be run the second search *HeapTupleSatisfiesVisibility*.
How about one of these options:
option 1:
most straightforward fix
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index d0e5922eed7..fa03bedd4b8 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -2577,6 +2577,11 @@ SampleHeapTupleVisible(TableScanDesc scan, Buffer buffer,
if (scan->rs_flags & SO_ALLOW_PAGEMODE)
{
+ int start, end;
+
+ if (hscan->rs_ntuples == 0)
+ return false;
+
/*
* In pageatatime mode, heap_prepare_pagescan() already did visibility
* checks, so just look at the info it left in rs_vistuples[].
@@ -2586,8 +2591,8 @@ SampleHeapTupleVisible(TableScanDesc scan, Buffer buffer,
* in increasing order, but it's not clear that there would be enough
* gain to justify the restriction.
*/
- int start = 0,
- end = hscan->rs_ntuples - 1;
+ start = 0;
+ end = hscan->rs_ntuples - 1;
while (start <= end)
{
option 2:
change the binary search code a bit more but avoid the extra branch
introduced by option 1.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index d0e5922eed7..c8e25bdd197 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -2586,18 +2586,17 @@ SampleHeapTupleVisible(TableScanDesc scan,
Buffer buffer,
* in increasing order, but it's not clear that there would be enough
* gain to justify the restriction.
*/
- int start = 0,
- end = hscan->rs_ntuples - 1;
+ uint32 start = 0, end = hscan->rs_ntuples;
- while (start <= end)
+ while (start < end)
{
- int mid = (start + end) / 2;
+ int mid = (start + end) / 2;
OffsetNumber curoffset = hscan->rs_vistuples[mid];
if (tupoffset == curoffset)
return true;
else if (tupoffset < curoffset)
- end = mid - 1;
+ end = mid;
else
start = mid + 1;
}
I'm looking at the commit and the replies in the thread.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
pgsql-hackers by date: