Em sex., 19 de ago. de 2022 às 10:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes: > At function parallel_vacuum_process_all_indexes there is > a typo with a logical connector. > I think that correct is &&, because both of the operators are > bool types [1]. > As a result, parallel vacuum workers can be incorrectly enabled.
Since they're bools, the C spec requires them to promote to integer 0 or 1, therefore the & operator will yield the desired result. So there's not going to be any incorrect behavior.
