Quick estimate of num of rows & table size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thalis Kalfigkopoulos
Subject Quick estimate of num of rows & table size
Date
Msg-id CAEkCx9F6mu7gmxAw_8=sA4HQRUmYruRkN77wRxtd7tvhEuTL3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Quick estimate of num of rows & table size  (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>)
Re: Quick estimate of num of rows & table size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Hi all,

I read somewhere that the following query gives a quick estimate of the # of rows in a table regardless of the table's size (which would matter in a simple SELECT count(*)?):

SELECT (CASE WHEN reltuples > 0 THEN
pg_relation_size('mytable')/(8192*relpages/reltuples)
ELSE 0
END)::bigint AS estimated_row_count
FROM pg_class
WHERE oid = 'mytable'::regclass;

If relpages & reltuples are recorded accurately each time VACUUM is run, wouldn't it be the same to just grab directly the value of reltuples like:

SELECT reltuples FROM pg_class WHERE oid='mytable'::regclass;

In the same manner, are pg_relation_size('mytable') and 8192*relpages the same?

I run both assumptions against a freshly VACUUMed table and they seem correct.

TIA,
Thalis K.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Difference between varchar and text?
Next
From: Lonni J Friedman
Date:
Subject: Re: Quick estimate of num of rows & table size