Re: BUG #16941: ECPG add support for const void* - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bryan Staley
Subject Re: BUG #16941: ECPG add support for const void*
Date
Msg-id CAEfnmY35th=FT_OO9rXSpi_GOXM6dO1snXwyWqRXAkUqgSgyDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16941: ECPG add support for const void*  (Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
My bad...

Try 

EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
  static const char TEST[2] = "F";
EXEC SQL END DECLARE SECTION;

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:36 PM Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
El día martes, marzo 23, 2021 a las 04:07:01p. m. +0000, PG Bug reporting form escribió:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference:      16941
> Logged by:          Bryan Staley
> Email address:      bryan.w.staley@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 13.1
> Operating system:   RHEL 7
> Description:       
>
> The following doesn't compile via ecpg
>
> ```
> EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
>   static const char[2] TEST = "F";
> EXEC SQL END DECLARE SECTION;
> ```
>
> Fails with
> error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*'
>

This would not even compile:

$ cc -v
FreeBSD clang version 11.0.0 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-11.0.0-0-g176249bd673)
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin

$ cat c.c

static const char[2] TEST = "F";

$ cc c.c
c.c:2:26: error: brackets are not allowed here; to declare an array, place the brackets after the identifier
static const char[2] TEST = "F";
                 ~~~     ^
                         [2]
1 error generated.



--
Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045
Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub
¡Con Cuba no te metas!  «»  Don't mess with Cuba!  «»  Leg Dich nicht mit Kuba an!
http://www.cubadebate.cu/noticias/2020/12/25/en-video-con-cuba-no-te-metas/

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Mundla, Sankar"
Date:
Subject: After upgrade from version9.4.1 to 10.15, changes on the table structure
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: After upgrade from version9.4.1 to 10.15, changes on the table structure