Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=3vV1YKxDfLMqq-nYM2fN+STMYLwPKFCoah4M0gxqqNNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I think that makes sense.  Modified it to read: "A statement that targets
>> a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning hierarchy..." in the
>> attached updated patch.
>
> LGTM.  Committed.

+    A statement that targets a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning

A tiny typo: s/a inheritance/an inheritance/

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)