Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa9oby5jfcVhZHxGvv6DJFt-xTBkBC-RApEg2i74+uftw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I think that makes sense.  Modified it to read: "A statement that targets
> a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning hierarchy..." in the
> attached updated patch.

LGTM.  Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take