Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZo4tZyShpz=geYma51yN5K=MNkhrrO69aJVVYbA2NdUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hmm.  DB2 has transition tables (invented them maybe?) and it allows
> OLD/NEW TABLE on row-level triggers:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEPGG_10.1.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.dbobj.doc/doc/t0020236.html

Yeah, my impression is that Kevin was pretty keen on supporting that
case.  I couldn't say exactly why, though.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] May cause infinite loop when initializing rel-cachecontains partitioned table