Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=3WXu0Ke8AB3i9Z8EdKZ_RajcKrkwj1GTkgcdqdaafjqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Nice detective work.  Possibly because libtool/ranlib whacks it with
> > utime(), which only knows about time_t, here:
> > https://github.com/opensource-apple/cctools/blob/master/misc/libtool.c#L2779
>
> I suspected as much, but hadn't gone looking for the code.  I wonder
> why it bothers with any of that... it's certainly not documented
> behavior per the man page.

As for why Apple make doesn't have the problem, I think it's simply
that high resolution timestamp support for Darwin came along ~5 years
after Apple forked/froze their make due to the license change.  Here's
the commit:

https://github.com/mirror/make/commit/bfc3e1ca7c0c1504c9873ee1baacce73330b037e

As for what could be done about it, it seems like we (or the Nix
project, in a local patch) could declare individual targets to have
.LOW_RESOLUTION_TIME:

https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Special-Targets.html

That doesn't seem any better than using "touch" to make a better mtime
though.  I'm kinda surprised that the Nix project doesn't have this
problem on other projects, though, if they're always using a modern
GNU make.  What are they doing differently?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization
Next
From: Nguyen Thi Nhu Thuy
Date:
Subject: [SUPPORT] How to calculate size of tables which are saved on disk?