On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:37 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> The 0013 patch also fixes a mistake in the 0010 patch: it is not
> appropriate to call CFI() while waiting to notify the checkpointer of
> a dirty segment, because then ^C could cause the following checkpoint
> not to flush dirty data.
(Though of course it wouldn't actually do that due to an LWLock being
held, but still, I removed the CFI because it was at best misleading).
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
