select_parallel test failure: gather sometimes losing tuples (maybeduring rescans)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject select_parallel test failure: gather sometimes losing tuples (maybeduring rescans)?
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2myZ4qxpt1a=C+wEv3o188K13K3UvD-44FK0SdAzHy+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: select_parallel test failure: gather sometimes losing tuples(maybe during rescans)?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I saw a one-off failure like this:

                                  QUERY PLAN
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Aggregate (actual rows=1 loops=1)
!    ->  Nested Loop (actual rows=98000 loops=1)
           ->  Seq Scan on tenk2 (actual rows=10 loops=1)
                 Filter: (thousand = 0)
                 Rows Removed by Filter: 9990
!          ->  Gather (actual rows=9800 loops=10)
                 Workers Planned: 4
                 Workers Launched: 4
                 ->  Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960 loops=50)
--- 485,495 ----
                                  QUERY PLAN
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Aggregate (actual rows=1 loops=1)
!    ->  Nested Loop (actual rows=97984 loops=1)
           ->  Seq Scan on tenk2 (actual rows=10 loops=1)
                 Filter: (thousand = 0)
                 Rows Removed by Filter: 9990
!          ->  Gather (actual rows=9798 loops=10)
                 Workers Planned: 4
                 Workers Launched: 4
                 ->  Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960 loops=50)


Two tuples apparently went missing.

Similar failures on the build farm:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=okapi&dt=2018-03-03%2020%3A15%3A01
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=locust&dt=2018-03-03%2018%3A13%3A32
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2018-03-03%2017%3A55%3A11

Could this be related to commit
34db06ef9a1d7f36391c64293bf1e0ce44a33915 or commit
497171d3e2aaeea3b30d710b4e368645ad07ae43?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR:unsupported type
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: select_parallel test failure: gather sometimes losing tuples(maybe during rescans)?