Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2bqGh6bYmbkmL98mqSJi75S9zYAF8AuFVyQFWj=nCs+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Andres pinged me off-list to point out this failure after my commit fb389498be:
>
> > ! FATAL:  semop(id=332464133) failed: Invalid argument
>
> I was just looking at that, and my guess is that it was caused by
> something doing an ipcrm or equivalent, and is unrelated to your patch.
> Especially since skink has succeeded with that patch in several other
> branches.
>
> If it's repeatable, then it would be time to get excited.

I found this case from January:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2018-01-05%2000%3A10%3A03

! FATAL:  semop(id=1313210374) failed: Invalid argument
! LINE 1: CREATE TABLE as_select1 AS SELECT * FROM pg_class WHERE relk...

       EINVAL The semaphore set doesn't exist, or semid is less than zero,
              or nsops has a nonpositive value.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE