Re: [HACKERS] Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA)
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2QtpZUnRY9AyWgw6NP-XvieKKpkqHo9ZLwXR43gfw-GA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA)  (Mahi Gurram <teckymahi@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Mahi Gurram <teckymahi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm building In-Memory index extension for Postgres, for which i'm trying to
> use DSA. But ended with some issues, as it is not allowing me to create
> DSA(Dynamic Shared Area) in _PG_init function.
>
> Please refer my_PG_init code below:
>>
>> void
>> _PG_init(void)
>> {
>> area = dsa_create(LWLockNewTrancheId(), "CustomIndex_DSA");
>> area_handle = dsa_get_handle(area);
>> }
>
>
> Because of this code, Postgres is not starting. Not even giving any error
> messages in pg logs. Hence, i'm totally clue less :(
>
>
> Please let me know how to proceed. Your help is highly appreciated.

Hi Mahi

If your plan is to write a preloaded library, then I think your
_PG_init() function needs to register a callback with
shmem_startup_hook.  See pgss_shmem_startup for an example.  You may
need to set up a piece of traditional named shared memory that
backends can use to find either (1) the handle for your DSA area or
(2) your DSA area itself (if you use the 'in place' constructor), and
also allocate and share a lock tranche number.

Another approach would be to create the DSA area on demand (ie the
first time you need it for your new index feature), if you don't want
to have to preload the library, but there is a small problem with
that, at least in theory.  You probably still need to use a small bit
of named traditional shmem for discovery purposes, and it's slightly
against the rules to do that when you haven't called
RequestAddinShmemSpace, and it's too late to do that.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months