Re: Unexpected behavior with transition tables in update statement trigger - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 AM, Tom Kazimiers <tom@voodoo-arts.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:15:44PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Tom Kazimiers <tom@voodoo-arts.net>
>> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reproducer.  Yeah, that seems to be a bug.
>> nodeNamedTuplestorescan.c allocates a new read pointer for each
>> separate scan of the named tuplestore, but it doesn't call
>> tuplestore_select_read_pointer() so that the two scans that appear in
>> your UNION ALL plan are sharing the same read pointer.  At first
>> glance the attached seems to fix the problem, but I'll need to look
>> more carefully tomorrow.
>
> Thanks very much for investigating this. I can confirm that applying your
> patch results in the tuples I expected in both my test trigger and my actual
> trigger function.

Thanks for testing.

> It would be great if this or a similar fix would make it into the next
> official release.

Here's a new version with tuplestore_select_read_pointer() added in
another place where it was lacking, and commit message.  Moving to
-hackers, where patches go.

Here's a shorter repro.  On master it prints:

NOTICE:  count = 1
NOTICE:  count union = 1

With the patch the second number is 2, as it should be.

CREATE TABLE test (i int);
INSERT INTO test VALUES (1);

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_trigger_fun() RETURNS trigger
LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
$$
  BEGIN
     RAISE NOTICE 'count = %', (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM new_test);
     RAISE NOTICE 'count union = %', (SELECT COUNT(*)
          FROM (SELECT * FROM new_test UNION ALL SELECT * FROM new_test) ss);
     RETURN NULL;
 END;
$$;

CREATE TRIGGER my_trigger AFTER UPDATE ON test
REFERENCING NEW TABLE AS new_test OLD TABLE as old_test
FOR EACH STATEMENT EXECUTE PROCEDURE my_trigger_fun();

UPDATE test SET i = i;

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com