On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> [parallel-append-doc-v2.patch]
+ plans just as they can in any other plan. However, in a parallel plan,
+ it is also possible that the planner may choose to substitute a
+ <literal>Parallel Append</literal> node.
Maybe drop "it is also possible that "? It seems a bit unnecessary
and sounds a bit odd followed by "may <verb>", but maybe it's just me.
+ Also, unlike a regular <literal>Append</literal> node, which can only have
+ partial children when used within a parallel plan, <literal>Parallel
+ Append</literal> node can have both partial and non-partial child plans.
Missing "a" before "<literal>Parallel".
+ Non-partial children will be scanned by only a single worker, since
Are we using "worker" in a more general sense that possibly includes
the leader? Hmm, yes, other text on this page does that too. Ho hum.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
