On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Now, if you're still super-concerned about this breaking something, we
>> could commit it only to master, where it will have 9 months to bake
>> before it gets released. I think that's overly conservative, but I
>> think it's still better than waiting for the rewrite you'd like to see
>> happen. We don't know when or if anyone is going to undertake that,
>> and if we wait, we may easing release a v11 that's got the same defect
>> as v9.6 and now v10. And I don't see that we lose much by committing
>> this now even if that rewrite does happen in time for v11. Ripping
>> out CreateLocalJoinPath() won't be any harder than ripping out
>> GetExistingLocalJoinPath().
>
> Agreed. Attached is an rebased version which moved the new fields in
> JoinPathExtraData to the end of that struct.
FYI this doesn't compile anymore, because initial_cost_hashjoin() and
create_hashjoin_path() changed in master.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
