Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=11Y8veLFZhT7MfgCbDoYnJY50x_csF4XjbJYq94-e_YQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash  (Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 9         | 62928.88   | 59077.909

Thanks Rafia.  At first glance this plan is using the Parallel Shared
Hash in one place where it should pay off, that is loading the orders
table, but the numbers are terrible.  I noticed that it uses batch
files and then has to increase the number of batch files, generating a
bunch of extra work, even though it apparently overestimated the
number of rows, though that's only ~9 seconds of ~60.  I am
investigating.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)