On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 9/24/17 07:00, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Fair point. In that case there are a few others we should consider
>> moving down too for consistency, like in the attached.
>
>> Thanks, that is much tidier. Done that way in the attached.
>>
>> Here also is a small addition to your TAP test which exercises the
>> non-NULL code path because slapd rejects TLS by default with a
>> diagnostic message. I'm not sure if this is worth adding, since it
>> doesn't actually verify that the code path is reached (though you can
>> see that it is from the logs).
>
> Committed.
Thanks, and thanks also for follow-up commit 7d1b8e75. Looks like the
new macro arrived in OpenLDAP 2.4 but RHEL5 shipped with 2.3.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
