On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:42 AM, <ap@zip.com.au> wrote:
>>>> I think json_object should provide similar output. Consistency is nice
>>>> aesthetically and as being in line with the principle of least surprise.
>>>> Its lack may lead to possible unpleasant results if anyone tries to deal
>>>> with a JSON structure as TEXT (for whatever reason).
>>>
>>> That's a debatable point, and as any output is legal json it does not
>>> actually hurt one way or another. However, as json_object has been
>>> introduced at the same time as jsonb, I'd tend as well to think that
>>> consistency is a good idea if possible, see the patch attached.
>>
>> (It's a shame that json_build_object and json_object_agg also don't
>> agree on where to put whitespace...)
>
> Right, missed that, as well as json_object_two_arg.
One more difference is that json_object_agg uses "{ " and " }" while
the other functions use "{" and "}".
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
