Re: [GENERAL] “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From drum.lucas@gmail.com
Subject Re: [GENERAL] “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2
Date
Msg-id CAE_gQfUityfN=c_eWEvOkosLEA3OqJsA=pDe1oDppLvGeUi8DQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
It is customary to restrict emails to a single list or at least make others aware when you do have a legitmate need to cross-post.

Specifically your post on -admin <“Break” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2>

Yes, it didn't belong on -admin in the first place but posting it here with a different title and not indicating on either thread that the other exists and/or is the valid one just makes it harder for others to follow along.


Sorry about that. It wasn't on purpose... It won't happen again.
 

As for your general question I try to approach this problem in the following manner:

SELECT however many of something that you need (FOR UPDATE)
UPDATE those selected to indicate that they have been seen
PROCESS them as needed
​repeat step 1 until it returns no records

​It doesn't always work - and given a sufficiently large number of records it may be unadvisable - but it is set-oriented which is generally a plus in SQL.

The other way to assign batches is to use the integer modulus operator (e.g., 10 % 3 = 1 : read 3 remainder of 1) or integer division (10 / 3 = 3) to derive the batch number based upon an attribute of the data itself as opposed to its order of appearance in a result set.

David J.


 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2
Next
From: dinesh kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2