On 2 May 2016 at 18:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't much care for the hardwired magic number here, especially since
> exp_var() does not have its limit expressed as "6000" but as
> "NUMERIC_MAX_RESULT_SCALE * 3". I think you should rephrase the limit
> to use that expression, and also add something like this in exp_var():
OK, that makes sense. Done that way.
Regards,
Dean
