On 20 August 2012 21:26, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/20/2012 01:21 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I don't think US export regulations are the only issue. Some other
>>> countries (mostly the usual suspects) forbid the use of crypto software.
>>> If we build more crypto functions into the core we make it harder to use
>>> Postgres legally in those places.
>
>
> I fail to see how that is our problem. We shouldn't make the software less
> useful because of those places.
Agreed.
I find the idea of some secret policeman urging the use of MySQL
because it doesn't have a built-in SHA-1 cryptographic hash function
seems extremely far-fetched. The BitTorrent protocol uses SHA-1 to
validate chunks, and it has been variously estimated that 10% - 50% of
all internet traffic is BitTorrent traffic. SHA-1 is also integral to
the way that git makes content effectively tamper-proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8#t=56m
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
