On 18 November 2012 18:18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, we have two reports of people trying such values (assuming that
> #7545 actually is the same thing), and it didn't work for either of
> them. I don't think it's a problem to restrict the value to something
> that will work rather than fail.
Right. sizeof(int) is very probably 4 on all platforms that we
support. I see no problem with the proposal.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
