Re: xlog location arithmetic - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: xlog location arithmetic
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_WCTJKXV9UyJ9RgkMHH9aYid0NxmVEcbUE0esDB5nr8zA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: xlog location arithmetic  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 20 December 2011 10:27, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Doing it in numeric should be perfectly fine. The only real reason to
> pick int8 over in this context would be performance, but it's not like
> this is something that's going to be called in really performance
> critical paths...

FYI, my group commit patch has a little macro, in the spirit of
XLByteAdvance, to get the delta between two LSNs in bytes as an
uint64.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: psql \timing vs failed statements