Re: enhanced error fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: enhanced error fields
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_Ukbkw01AUyn3LfJ0nUkDpMe7i+nzVPJ1KT9xWGKyPfKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enhanced error fields  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: enhanced error fields  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 24 October 2012 23:29, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> Let me know if you think that that's a good idea.
>
> I guess you didn't get around to it.

I did get some work on this done, which does change things somewhat.
In particular, I think that the need to have so many new fields is
questionable, and so have removed some. I will get around to this, and
will incorporate those ideas.

The errrel() calls with index relations are not sane, but that's just
an oversight. The next revision will actually do this:

+     Assert(table->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION);

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation