Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_U_D=gp-DmfmkeRvaQqwO5UZj75y96Z0J3te7puetRnqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add REFRESH
> SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more REFRESH
> options to come.

I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do we
really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon invent a
new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the term snapshot
is widely recognised as referring to anything other than snapshot
isolation.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicated oids between tables - problem or not?