Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 20121126160521.GD31816@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:02:17PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> > REFRESH options to come.
> 
> I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do
> we really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon
> invent a new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the
> term snapshot is widely recognised as referring to anything other
> than snapshot isolation.

I believe that the meaning here is unambiguous, and is used in other
descriptions than Oracle's, including the one on our wiki.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicated oids between tables - problem or not?
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch releases