Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 20121126152456.GA31816@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/14/12 9:28 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > 17. Since the data viewed in an MV is not up-to-date with the
> > latest committed transaction,
> 
> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
> "snapshot", not a materialized view.  Maybe that's what it should be
> called then.

"Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle materialized
view.  There are others, which we'll eventually add if past is any
prologue :)

I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add REFRESH
SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more REFRESH
options to come.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility