btw, there are some typos in Patch v5, %s/ralation/relation/g
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:05 PM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> > Yeah, that's better. On again thinking about the function name, I
> > wonder if validate_relation_type() suits here as there is no generic
> > object being passed?
>
> Yep, validate_relation_type() sounds better.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao